The 'Theory Of Everything' Will Necessarily Be Based On Gravitation
I Am Following The ‘Principle Theory' Path, Like That Of Einstein, Where You Search For A General Principle In Our Everyday Experiences, That Can Explain Why The Lower Level Phenomena Exist, And Behave, As They Do.
One of my subscribers brought an article to my attention today, that you might be interested in. The article was recently published in NewScientist. For me, it was welcome news that bolsters my own theory of Cognizant Gravitation Only. Not that the article has anything to do with my work; but it details the work of several labs who are focused on the participation of gravitation in quantum activity, in which it has a productive role. You don't have to read the article, just the title suffices for my purposes, but I'll include a quote too. The title is: "Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything."
The descriptions in the NewScientist article of the different research efforts working with gravity today exhibit a common structure, but one that Albert Einstein turned away from in his own search for an understanding of the true laws of nature. My work on a theory of cognizant gravitation uses the method that Einstein finally turned to, which enabled him to complete his theory of relativity. In this newsletter, I will explain these two methods and what is at stake. Then I will give some concrete examples from my own work that show why I say that a 'theory of everything' will necessarily be based on gravitation.